back start next


[start] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79] [80] [81] [82] [83] [84] [85] [86] [87] [88] [89] [90] [91] [92] [93] [94] [95] [96] [97] [98] [99] [100] [101] [102] [103] [104] [105] [106] [107] [108] [109] [110] [ 111 ] [112] [113] [114] [115] [116] [117] [118] [119] [120] [121] [122] [123] [124] [125] [126] [127] [128] [129] [130] [131] [132] [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] [140] [141] [142] [143] [144] [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150]


111

Source: Microsoft Excel.

Figure 17.8 shows the Buy (above the x-axis) and Sell (below the x-axis) indicators for AT&T over the 10-year period as defined by the preceding trading strategy. Figure 17.9 shows the closing price of AT&T during this period, with the Buy and Sell indicators plotted. Buy indicators appear as diamonds above the price curve; Sell indicators appear as squares below the price curve.

Table 17.7 shows the results of the individual trades resulting from this approach. During the 10-year period of consideration, 16 trades were made for an average gain of 21.2 percent per trade. The average annual gain of each trade was 33.6 percent. With the exception of trade number one, all trades produce a positive return. For short positions, we simply calculate the return as the percentage gain between the Buy and Sell price.

Figure 17.10 shows similar chart analysis for IBM. Table 17.8 shows the performance results of the individual trades. During the 10-year period of consideration, 20 trades were made for an average gain of 34.3 percent per trade. The average annual gain of each trade was 33.5 percent.

Figure 17.9 price data and corresponding buy/Sell indicators for AT&T.



Establish

Close

Number of

Annualized

Trade #

Position

Price

Date

Position

Price

Date

Trading Days

% Gain

% Gain

$25,750

870106

Sell

$21,571

870626

-16.23

-35.01

$21,440

870911

49.25

16.33

$21,125

870921

51.48

17.20

$31,875

890914

0.39

0.37

$31,000

891213

3.23

3.90

$29,875

900604

Sell

$32,000

901019

7.11

18.94

Sell

$32,696

901206

$29,695

910529

10.11

21.99

$29,695

910529

25.67

49.27

$30,944

910620

20.60

44.44

$31,324

910628

19.14

43.82

$32,000

910826

Sell

$37,319

911209

16.62

58.63

$31,441

921127

73.34

33.52

$39,000

941003

39.74

98.79

$38,000

941021

Sell

$54,500

950302

43.42

124.54

$52,500

950714

14.05

15.47

$50,375

950908

Sell

$59,875

960619 Average:

198 253.1

18.86 21.2

24.86 33.6

FIGURE 17.10 PRICE DATA AND CORRESPONDING BUY/SELL INDICATORS FOR IBM.

170 +♦,,

a 130

i1 1104 «

£ I <J

90 +

70 i

50 i

4v >•£, f

> it i

30 -»

-ft1 U"

N N

CM CM

Date

CM CM CO

0)0)0>0)0)0)0)0)0>



Establish

Close

Number of

Annualized

Trade #

Position

Price

Date

Position

Price

Date

Trading Days

% Gain

% Gain

$156,625

870204

Sell

$160,875

970210

2.71

141.64

Sell

SI 18.000

870623

15.97

8.34

Sell

$116,625

880201

$101,750

890613

14.62

11.03

$101.75

890613

5.53

10.86

$100.75

890621

6.58

13.52

$97,375

870706

10.27

22.92

$94,625

890815

13.48

39.53

$99,000

890901

Sell

$107,375

891219

8.46

29.07

$103.88

900329

23.70

47.58

$106.38

900518

20.79

57.13

$100.25

900607

Sell

$128,500

901002

28.18

89.69

$101.38

910321

1328

25.76

5.06

$98,500

910409

1316

29.44

5.84

$103.63

910523

1284

23.03

4.68

$92,875

920312

1081

37.28

9.00

$42,750

930413

198.25

64.12

$51,875

930716

145.78

51.35

$92,875

941222

37.28

25.81

$107,500

950327

18.60

15.51

$106,750

950413

Sell

$127,500

960619 Average:

300 462.4

19.44 34.3

16.91 33.5

Conclusion

Statistical Network data mining provides a highly automated ontogenic approach to interpreting technical indicators for daily price data. It allows creativity in defining a robust set of input indicators, and flexibility in defining different trading strategies. The results shown here demonstrate the validity of this approach.

Endnotes

1. Takens, E, "Detecting Strange Attractor in Turbulence," Lecture Notes in Mathematics, D. Rand, L.Young (Ed.), Berlin: Springer, 1981.

2. Minsky, M., and Papert, S., Perceptrons, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1969.

Table 17.8 Trading results for IBM



[start] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26] [27] [28] [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] [35] [36] [37] [38] [39] [40] [41] [42] [43] [44] [45] [46] [47] [48] [49] [50] [51] [52] [53] [54] [55] [56] [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] [63] [64] [65] [66] [67] [68] [69] [70] [71] [72] [73] [74] [75] [76] [77] [78] [79] [80] [81] [82] [83] [84] [85] [86] [87] [88] [89] [90] [91] [92] [93] [94] [95] [96] [97] [98] [99] [100] [101] [102] [103] [104] [105] [106] [107] [108] [109] [110] [ 111 ] [112] [113] [114] [115] [116] [117] [118] [119] [120] [121] [122] [123] [124] [125] [126] [127] [128] [129] [130] [131] [132] [133] [134] [135] [136] [137] [138] [139] [140] [141] [142] [143] [144] [145] [146] [147] [148] [149] [150]